Atividade Física ou Aptidão Física (estudo com mais de 40 mil pessoas)

Tái daqueles estudos que a gente fica feliz de ver. Mais de 40 mil pessoas, mais de 20 anos de acompanhamento e…. o final? Aptidão Física é mais relevante que Atividade Física quando se fala de mortalidade. Parece ser trivial, mas não é o que muita gente pensa!

D-C Lee1, X Sui, F B Ortega, Y-S Kim, T S Church, R A Winett, U Ekelund, P T Katzmarzyk, S N Blair. Comparisons of leisure-time physical activity and cardiorespiratory fitness as predictors of all-cause mortality in men and wome. Br J Sports Med 2011;45:504-510 doi:10.1136/bjsm.2009.066209

Objective To examine the combined associations and relative contributions of leisure-time physical activity (PA) and cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) with all-cause mortality.

Design Prospective cohort study.

Setting Aerobics centre longitudinal study.

Participants 31 818 men and 10 555 women who received a medical examination during 1978–2002.

Assessment of risk factors Leisure-time PA assessed by self-reported questionnaire; CRF assessed by maximal treadmill test.

Main outcome measures All-cause mortality until 31 December 2003.

Results There were 1492 (469 per 10 000) and 230 (218 per 10 000) deaths in men and women, respectively. PA and CRF were positively correlated in men (r=0.49) and women (r=0.47) controlling for age (p<0.001 for both). PA was inversely associated with mortality in multivariable Cox regression analysis among men, but the association was eliminated after further adjustment for CRF. No significant association of PA with mortality was observed in women. CRF was inversely associated with mortality in men and women, and the associations remained significant after further adjustment for PA. In the PA and CRF combined analysis, compared with the reference group “not meeting the recommended PA (<500 metabolic equivalent-minute/week) and unfit”, the relative risks (95% CIs) of mortality were 0.62 (0.54 to 0.72) and 0.61 (0.44 to 0.86) in men and women “not meeting the recommended PA and fit”, 0.96 (0.61 to 1.53) and 0.93 (0.33 to 2.58) in men and women “meeting the recommended PA and unfit” and 0.60 (0.51 to 0.70) and 0.56 (0.37 to 0.85) in men and women “meeting the recommended PA and fit”, respectively.

Conclusions CRF was more strongly associated with all-cause mortality than PA; therefore, improving CRF should be encouraged in unfit individuals to reduce risk of mortality and considered in the development of future PA guidelines. Aí que fica legal = Aumentar a Aptidão Física!!!

Anúncios

Deixe um comentário

Preencha os seus dados abaixo ou clique em um ícone para log in:

Logotipo do WordPress.com

Você está comentando utilizando sua conta WordPress.com. Sair / Alterar )

Imagem do Twitter

Você está comentando utilizando sua conta Twitter. Sair / Alterar )

Foto do Facebook

Você está comentando utilizando sua conta Facebook. Sair / Alterar )

Foto do Google+

Você está comentando utilizando sua conta Google+. Sair / Alterar )

Conectando a %s